0.02/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.02/0.10	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.10/0.30	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.10/0.30	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.30	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.30	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.30	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.30	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.10/0.30	% WCLimit    : 240
0.10/0.30	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:34:19 EDT 2025
0.10/0.30	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.42	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.16/0.42	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ezx99MbSJ6/E---3.1_14496.p
0.16/0.46	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.16/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.16/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.16/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# sh4l with pid 14577 completed with status 0
0.16/0.46	# Result found by sh4l
0.16/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.16/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.16/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.46	# Search class: HHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
0.16/0.46	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.16/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# new_ho_10 with pid 14583 completed with status 0
0.16/0.46	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.16/0.46	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
0.16/0.46	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.16/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 1200s (5) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# Starting sh4l with 240s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.46	# Search class: HHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
0.16/0.46	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.16/0.46	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.16/0.46	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.16/0.46	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.16/0.46	
0.16/0.46	# Proof found!
0.16/0.46	# SZS status Theorem
0.16/0.46	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.16/0.46	thf(decl_23, type, nt: $i > $i).
0.16/0.46	thf(decl_24, type, imp: $i > $i > $i).
0.16/0.46	thf(decl_25, type, cT: $i > $o).
0.16/0.46	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.16/0.46	thf(cLCL077_1, conjecture, ~(((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X1))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X3)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X3))))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))))&?[X4:$i]:(~((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X4)) @ X4)))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ X2)|~((cT @ X1))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Ezx99MbSJ6/E---3.1_14496.p', cLCL077_1)).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(~(((((![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X1))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X3)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X3))))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))))&?[X4:$i]:(~(cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X4)) @ X4))))&![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ X2)|~(cT @ X1)|~(cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cLCL077_1])])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i, X18:$i, X19:$i, X20:$i, X21:$i, X23:$i, X24:$i]:((((((cT @ (imp @ X15 @ (imp @ X16 @ X15)))&(cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X17 @ (imp @ X18 @ X19)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X17 @ X18) @ (imp @ X17 @ X19)))))&(cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X20) @ (nt @ X21)) @ (imp @ X21 @ X20))))&~(cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ esk1_0)) @ esk1_0)))&((cT @ X24)|~(cT @ X23)|~(cT @ (imp @ X23 @ X24))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((cT @ X1)|~((cT @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X3)) @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X2) @ (imp @ X1 @ X3)))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X3)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ (imp @ X3 @ X2))))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_5])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_6])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X3)))|~((cT @ (imp @ X3 @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ (imp @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ X1 @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X3 @ X1) @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_6])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X3))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X2 @ X1) @ X3))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X1))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_10])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ X2))|~((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ X1 @ X3) @ X2))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (imp @ (nt @ X1) @ (nt @ X2)) @ X1))|~((cT @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_8])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X1)) @ X1))|~((cT @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ esk1_0)) @ esk1_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cT @ (imp @ (nt @ (nt @ X1)) @ X1))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_4])).
0.16/0.46	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])]), ['proof']).
0.16/0.46	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.16/0.46	# Parsed axioms                        : 4
0.16/0.46	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.16/0.46	# Initial clauses                      : 8
0.16/0.46	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
0.16/0.46	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
0.16/0.46	# Processed clauses                    : 62
0.16/0.46	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.16/0.46	# ...subsumed                          : 15
0.16/0.46	# ...remaining for further processing  : 47
0.16/0.46	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.16/0.46	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.16/0.46	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.16/0.46	# Backward-rewritten                   : 3
0.16/0.46	# Generated clauses                    : 185
0.16/0.46	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 166
0.16/0.46	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.16/0.46	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.16/0.46	# Paramodulations                      : 185
0.16/0.46	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.16/0.46	# NegExts                              : 0
0.16/0.46	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.16/0.46	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.16/0.46	# Total rewrite steps                  : 11
0.16/0.46	# ...of those cached                   : 5
0.16/0.46	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.16/0.46	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.16/0.46	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.16/0.46	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.16/0.46	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.16/0.46	# Current number of processed clauses  : 39
0.16/0.46	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
0.16/0.46	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.16/0.46	#    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.16/0.46	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
0.16/0.46	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 109
0.16/0.46	# ...number of literals in the above   : 249
0.16/0.46	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.16/0.46	# Current number of archived clauses   : 8
0.16/0.46	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 205
0.16/0.46	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 205
0.16/0.46	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
0.16/0.46	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
0.16/0.46	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.16/0.46	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
0.16/0.46	# BW rewrite match successes           : 3
0.16/0.46	# Condensation attempts                : 62
0.16/0.46	# Condensation successes               : 2
0.16/0.46	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 3056
0.16/0.46	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 96
0.16/0.46	
0.16/0.46	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.46	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.16/0.46	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.16/0.46	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.16/0.46	# Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
0.16/0.46	
0.16/0.46	# -------------------------------------------------
0.16/0.46	# User time                : 0.007 s
0.16/0.46	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.16/0.46	# Total time               : 0.011 s
0.16/0.46	# Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
0.16/0.46	% E exiting
0.16/0.46	% E exiting
0.16/0.46	EOF